No-strike clauses and the IWW
<div class="field field-type-filefield field-field-photo">
<div class="field-items">
<div class="field-item odd">
<div class="filefield-file"><img class="filefield-icon field-icon-image-jpeg" alt="image/jpeg icon" src="http://libcom.org/sites/libcom.org/modules/contrib/filefield/icons/image-x-generic.png" /><a href="http://libcom.org/files/images/library/sagmeetingsigns.jpg" type="image/jpeg; length=15875">sagmeetingsigns.jpg</a></div> </div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="field field-type-text field-field-introduction">
<div class="field-items">
<div class="field-item odd">
<p> Juan Conatz on no-strike clause,s how they became common, what previous Wobblies thought of them and why they are bad for the IWW. </p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>Recently there’s been a decent amount of discussion about no-strike clauses, both in the IWW and <a href="http://labornotes.org/blogs/2011/12/no-strike-clauses-hold-back-unions" class="bb-url">within wider labor-left circles</a>. It’s a really interesting discussion, because finally a specific element of contractual organizing is being called into question in relation to how we organize and what our goals are.</p>
<p><a href="http://libcom.org/library/no-strike-clauses-iww" target="_blank">read more</a></p>